Let’s start with the conclusion：
From the aspect of function, toothpastes containing sodium monofluorophosphate has more functions than sodium fluoride toothpastes.
So, it is hard to say if sodium monofluorophosphate is better than fluoride, because they have slight differences in function, that are suitable for different individuals.
Comparing in functions:
First of all, the ingredients using in fluoride toothpaste are toothpaste grade sodium fluoride and sodium monofluorophoasphate with toothpaste grade.
Both of these ingredients are fluoride, commonly used in anti-cavity toothpastes, and are more representative of anti-cavity toothpaste ingredients. There’s also a common ingredient called stannous fluoride, since we’re only discussing the first two in this question.
Normal anti-caries toothpaste can be effective in preventing caries as long as it contains more than 0.1% fluoride. Comparison in the case of the same amount of fluoride, theoretically these two ingredients are about the same caries prevention effect, so from the point of view of caries prevention to choose, just any one can be.
The result is obvious from the whitening effect. Phosphate composition can be combined with calcium ions in dental calculus, which can effectively reduce the generation of dental calculus, thus achieving the effect of teeth whitening. Sodium monofluorophosphate toothpaste grade has a plus point in this point of teeth whitening.
Cost considerations:
Sodium fluoride toothpaste is less expensive than sodium monofluorophosphate, making it a better choice if you’re price-sensitive and only need the toothpaste’s cavity protection.
This post is the response for
- Is it better to use sodium monofluorophosphate or sodium fluoride for toothpaste?
- sodium monofluorophosphate vs sodium fluoride whitening
Other comparing:
